Table of Contents
Overview of Manual
Definition of Terms
Uses for Paint and Coatings
Paint Composition
Description of Coatings Processes
Examples of Typical Systems
Sources of Wastes
Summary
Clean Air Act
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Clean Water Act
Characterizing a Facility
Planning
Identify Pollution
Prevention Opportunities
Analyze and Select Options
Pilot Test or Validate
Preferred Options
Procure and Implement New System
Evaluate and Keep the Program
Going
Rigid Inventory Control
Good Housekeeping
Paint Mixing
Operator Training
High Transfer
Efficiency Equipment
Alternative Coatings
Proper Cleaning Methods
Filters
On-Site Solvent Recycling
General Description
Pollution Problem
Mechanical Cleaning
Chemically-Assisted Cleaning
Conversion Coatings
Stripping
General P2 Options for Surface Preparation
Cleaning
Solvent Vapor Degreasing
Degreasing
with Liquid Solvents (Cold Cleaning)
Alternative Cleaning Methods
Conversion Coatings
Stripping
Conventional Paint Composition
Switch to Surface-Free Coating
Alternative Coatings
High-Solids Coatings
Waterborne Coatings
Powder Coating
Radiation Curing
Emerging Technologies
Advantages and
Disadvantages
Cost and
Implementation Issues
General Description of
Spray Systems
Pollution Problem
General P2 Options
Transfer
Efficiency and Paint Application
Strategies to Improve Transfer Efficiency
Conventional Air Spray (LVHP)
High-Volume/Low-Pressure (HVLP) Air Spray
Low-Pressure/Low-Volume (LPLV)
General Description
Airless Spray
Electrostatic Spray
Other Methods
Advantages and
Disadvantages
Cost and
Implementation Issues
Paint Booths
General Description
Pollution Problem
P2 Options
List of Tables
Table
1. Common Solvents, Federal Regulatory Status
Table
2. Scheduled Date for MACT Standards for Surface Coating
Table
3. EPA Guidelines for Maximum VOC Content of Coatings
Table
4. Hazardous Wastes Generated from Coatings Operations
Table 5.
Overview of Assessment Information
Table
6. Opportunities for Improved Housekeeping in Coating Operations
Table
7. P2 Options for Coatings Processes
Table
8. Alternatives to Chlorinated Solvent Cleaning
Table
9. Advantages and Disadvantages of Plastic Media Blasting
Table
10. Advantages and Disadvantages of Vacuum Sanding Systems
Table
11. Advantages and Disadvantages of Sodium Bicarbonate
Table
12. Advantages and Disadvantages of Wheat Starch Blasting
Table
13. Advantages and Disadvantages of Carbon Dioxide Blasting
Table
14. Advantages and Disadvantages of Sponge Blasting Systems
Table
15. Advantages and Disadvantages of Water Blasting Systems
Table
16. Advantages and Disadvantages of Fluidized Bed Stripping
Table
17. Overview of Alternative Surface Preparation Technologies
Table
18. Health Effects of Solvents Used in Paint Formulations
Table
19. Overview of Alternatives to Solvent-Borne Coatings
Table
20. Advantages and Disadvantages of High-Solids Coatings
Table
21. Advantages and Disadvantages of Waterborne Coatings
Table
22. Characteristics of Powder Coating Techniques
Table
23. Advantages and Disadvantages of Powder Coatings
Table
24. Summary of Powder Coating Resin Properties
Table
25. Advantages and Disadvantages of Radiation-Cured Coatings
Table
26. Advantages and Disadvantages of VIC
Table
27. Advantages and Disadvantages of Unicoat Paint Technology
Table
28. Cost/Benefit Summary for Spray Application Methods
Table
29. Advantages and Disadvantages of HVLP Spray Guns
Table
30. Advantages and Disadvantages of LPLV Spray Guns
Table
31. Advantages and Disadvantages of Airless Spray Systems
Table
32. Advantages and Disadvantages of Electrostatic Spray Guns
Table
33. Advantages and Disadvantages of E-Coat Systems
Table
34. Advantages and Disadvantages of Autodeposition Systems
Table
35. Advantages and Disadvantages of Dip Coating Systems
Table
36. Advantages and Disadvantages of Flow Coating Systems
Table
37. Advantages and Disadvantages of Curtain Coating Systems
Table
38. Advantages and Disadvantages of Roll Coating Systems
Table
39. Advantages and Disadvantages of Plural Component Proportioning Systems
Table
40. Advantages and Disadvantages of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide
Table
41. Tansfer Efficiencies of Various Application Technologies
Table
42. Overview of Application Technologies
Table
43. Advantages and Disadvantages of Dry Filter Booths
Table 44. Air/Force Dry
Vs. Bake
Table
45. Typical RACT Limits for Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coating
List of Figures
Figure 1. Overview of the Coating Process
Figure 2. Coating Process and Waste Generation
Figure 3. Emissions vs. VOC Content
Figure 4. Major Resin Fluidization Methods
Figure 5. HVLP System
This manual is broken down into nine chapters as described below. Supporting case
studies, tables, figures and appendices are also provided.
- Chapter 1 provides background information on paints and coatings, including a discussion
of the coatings process and wastes generated.
- Chapter 2 presents an overview of federal regulations that affect coatings
processes.
- Chapter 3 provides specific information on the role of technical assistance providers in
promoting pollution prevention.
- Chapter 4 is an overview of pollution prevention options for surface preparation,
coatings applica- tion/curing and equipment cleaning.
- Chapter 5 discusses surface preparation methods with an emphasis on reducing solvent
use.
- Chapter 6 presents alternatives to solvent-borne coatings, including high-solids,
waterborne and powder coatings.
- Chapter 7 provides an overview of application techniques (i.e., spray painting and other
methods) along with a discussion of transfer efficiency.
- Chapter 8 presents information on curing methods.
- Chapter 9 discusses alternatives to traditional equipment cleaning methods.
- Appendix A presents information resources for coatings.
- Appendix B presents information on how to calculate VOC/HAP emissions.
- Appendix C provides information on conducting an economic analysis of paint costs.
- Appendix D presents purchasing guidelines for HVLP spray guns.
- Appendix E presents information on coatings testing.
- Appendix F provides a glossary of terms pertaining to the coatings process.
- Appendix G provides information on calculating transfer efficiency.
Audience
NEWMOA designed this manual for individuals who are involved in providing technical
assistance to firms seeking information on P2 for paint and coating processes. NEWMOA
believes that the information in this manual also would be useful for environmental
inspectors and permit writers who are involved in regulatory compliance activities.
Comments and suggestions from manual users on content and format are welcomed. Please take
a moment and complete the evaluation form included with this document to help us with
future versions of this manual and related manuals, or call NEWMOA at (617) 367-8558 to
speak with us directly.
Using This Manual
This manual is designed to serve as a complete reference on P2 methods for paint and
coating processes, however, it alone should not be used to advise companies on the
selection of a particular coating system. The selection of a coating system depends on a
number of application-specific factors, including the type of surface to be coated as well
as the required performance characteristics of the coating. Companies that decide to adopt
an alternative system should do so only after consultation with the appropriate coating
and equipment vendors, and careful in-house analyses of the costs and benefits as well as
technical feasibility of the alternative system.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect those of NEWMOA, NEWMOA
member states, Waste Management and Research Center (WMRC), or U.S. EPA. Mention of any
company, process, or product name should not be considered an endorsement by NEWMOA,
NEWMOA member states, WMRC, or U.S. EPA.
Acknowledgments
NEWMOA is indebted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Pollution
Prevention for its support for this project. The Northeast states provided additional
in-kind support.
NEWMOA would also like to thank those who provided advice and assistance, especially
those who volunteered on the peer review committee:
Alan Buckley, Massachusetts Office of Technical Assistance
Mike Callahan, Jacobs Engineering Group Inc
Dean Cornstubble, Research Triangle Institute
Lynn Corson, Ph.D., Purdue University
Mike Eck, U.S. Army Environmental Center
Tim Greiner, Greiner Environmental
Paul Pagel, MnTAP
Jeff Palmer, The Powder Coating Institute
Alice Pincus, Pincus Associates
Paul Randall, U.S. EPA
Alexander Ross, RadTech
Mike Simek, Rutgers
Rodger Talbert, Chemical Coaters Association International
David Liebl, Solid and Hazardous Waste Education Center
Kathy Blake, New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services
Project Staff/Contributors
Terri Goldberg, NEWMOA P2 Program ManagerEditor/Manager
Lisa Regenstein, NEWMOA P2 Project ManagerResearch/Writer
Jennifer Shearman, NEWMOA Technical StaffResearch/Writer
Beth Anderson, EPAEPA Project Manager
Laurie Case, WMRCLayout and Desktop Publishing
NEWMOA welcomes users of this manual to cite and reproduce sections
of it for use in providing assistance to companies. However, the Association requests that
users cite the document whenever reproducing or quoting so that appropriate credit is give
to original authors, NEWMOA and U.S. EPA. NEWMOA thanks you for cooperating with this
request.
Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association
The Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association (NEWMOA) is a non-profit,
nonpartisan, interstate governmental association. The membership is composed of state
environmental agency directors of the hazardous waste, solid waste, waste site cleanup and
pollution prevention programs in Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New
York, Rhode Island, and Vermont.
NEWMOA's mission is to help states articulate, promote, and implement economically
sound regional programs for the enhancement of environmental protection. The group
fulfills this mission by providing a variety of support services that facilitate
communication and cooperation among member states and between the states and EPA, and
promote the efficient sharing of state and federal program resources.
NEWMOA was established by the governors of the New England states as an official
interstate regional organization, in accordance with Section 1005 of the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The organization was formally recognized by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1986. It is funded by state membership dues and
EPA grants.
NEWMOA established the Northeast States Pollution Prevention Roundtable (NE P2
Roundtable) in 1989 to enhance the capabilities of member state environmental officials to
implement effective source reduction programs. The NE P2 Roundtable's program involves the
following components: (1) managing a regional roundtable of state pollution prevention
programs; (2) publishing a newsletter; (3) managing a resource center of books, reports,
case studies, fact sheets, notices of upcoming meetings and conferences, and a list of P2
experts; (4) organizing training; and (5) conducting research and publishing reports and
other documents. The resource center provides pollution prevention information to state
and local government officials, the public, industry, and others. Funding for the NE P2
Roundtable is provided by the NEWMOA member states and the U.S. EPA. For more information
contact: Terri Goldberg, NEWMOA, 129 Portland Street, 6th floor, Boston, MA 02114, (617)
367-8558 x302 (Phone); (617) 367-0449 (Fax); newmoa@aol.com (e-mail).
About This Manual
The Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association (NEWMOA) designed this manual to
provide environmental assistance staff with a basic reference on the metal coatings
process. The purpose of the manual is to enable assistance providers to rely on a single
publication to jump start their research on pollution prevention for companies with which
they are working. The manual is explicitly designed to be useful to assistance
professionals with experience working with metal coating operations and those who have
never before encountered this process. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Pollution
Prevention Division funded this manual as a model of a comprehensive packet of pollution
prevention (P2) information on a single industry.
The Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association designed this manual to provide
information on P2 methods for paints and coatings processes. Specifically, the manual
focuses on P2 methods for reducing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted during the
coating of metal substrates. This manual stresses the use of low-VOC paints and coatings
(i.e., high-solids, waterborne and powder coatings that contain lower solvent
concentrations than conventional paints) as well as techniques that can increase transfer
efficiency (i.e., the percentage of paints actually put on the part compared to the amount
of paint used/sprayed). Methods for reducing the amount of solvents used during other
stages of the coatings process, particularly surface preparation and equipment cleaning,
also figure prominently.
NEWMOA collaborates with state and local environmental assistance programs in the
Northeast; these programs have requested this manual to help them provide more efficient
and effective help to the numerous companies with metal coating operations. Assistance
providers have reported frustration with having to search databases for materials only to
obtain a list of citations and case studies that they have to spend considerable time
finding in order to provide information to their client companies. In addition, these
officials rarely have the opportunity to check the accuracy of the information they find
in databases to determine whether the material is still current. To avoid duplicating
efforts and to ensure that the information companies receive is up-to-date and accurate,
NEWMOA developed this manual as a model "synthesized" information packet that
includes an exhaustive compilation and synthesis of existing materials on P2 for the metal
coatings process.
To compile this manual, NEWMOA reviewed many books, articles, fact sheets, reports and
guides on P2 for metal coatings operations. NEWMOA staff also sent a draft of the manual
to more than 15 expert reviewers for their comments and suggestions. The result is an
up-to-date compilation of information on P2 options for metal coatings. However, pollution
prevention is a rapidly changing field, and all users should check with the various
centers identified in Appendix A to determine whether any new information is
available. |